Effect of Daridorexant on the Pharmacokinetics of Midazolam, and on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Warfarin in Healthy Male Subjects.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Daridorexant, a dual orexin receptor antagonist was recently approved for the treatment of insomnia at doses up to 50 mg once per night. This study investigated the effect of single-dose and multiple-dose daridorexant 50 mg at steady state on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4-sensitive substrate midazolam, and the effect of single-dose daridorexant 50 mg on the PK and pharmacodynamics (PD) of the CYP2C9-sensitive substrate warfarin. METHODS: In this prospective, single-center, open-label, fixed-sequence, phase I, drug-drug interaction study, 18 healthy male subjects sequentially received Treatment A, B, and C in three periods. Treatment A consisted of a single oral concomitant administration of midazolam 2 mg and warfarin 25 mg on day 1 of the first period. Treatment B consisted of one oral administration of daridorexant 50 mg followed 1 h later by a single oral dose of midazolam 2 mg concomitantly with a single oral dose of warfarin 25 mg on day 1 and a once-daily oral administration of daridorexant 50 mg for 6 days of the second period. Treatment C consisted of a single oral administration of daridorexant 50 mg at steady state followed 1 h later by a single oral administration of midazolam 2 mg on day 1 of the third period. Blood samples were assessed for midazolam and S-warfarin PK, and PD (international normalized ratio and factor VII). Noncompartmental  PK parameters and PD variables were evaluated with geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals of Treatment B/A versus C/A for midazolam, and treatment B/A for warfarin. Safety and tolerability of each treatment were also assessed. RESULTS: Midazolam maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC0-24) were 1.13- and 1.42-fold higher, respectively, after single-dose administration of daridorexant 50 mg compared to administration of midazolam alone, while Cmax and AUC0-24 were 1.12- and 1.35-fold higher, respectively, after administration of daridorexant 50 mg once daily at steady state. Terminal half-life and time to maximum plasma concentration were comparable between treatments. Daridorexant had no influence on the PK and PD of warfarin. All treatments were safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Daridorexant at 50 mg is classified as a weak CYP3A4 inhibitor after single- and multiple-dose administration once daily at steady state. Daridorexant 50 mg did not induce CYP3A4 activity or inhibit CYP2C9 activity. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial (NCT05480488) was registered on 29 July, 2022.

Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of the CYP3A4 and CYP2C9 Drug-Drug Interaction of Avacopan in 2 Open-Label Studies in Healthy Participants.

Avacopan, a complement 5a receptor (C5aR) antagonist approved for treating severe active antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis, was evaluated in 2 clinical drug-drug interaction studies. The studies assessed the impact of avacopan on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of CYP3A4 substrates midazolam and simvastatin and CYP2C9 substrate celecoxib, and the influence of CYP3A4 inhibitor itraconazole and inducer rifampin on the PKs of avacopan. The results indicated that twice-daily oral administration of 30 mg of avacopan increased the area under the curve (AUC) of midazolam by 1.81-fold and celecoxib by 1.15-fold when administered without food, and twice-daily oral administration of 30 or 60 mg of avacopan increased the AUC of simvastatin by approximately 2.6-3.5-fold and the AUC of the active metabolite ß-hydroxy-simvastatin acid by approximately 1.4-1.7-fold when co-administered with food. Furthermore, the AUC of avacopan increased by approximately 2.19-fold when co-administered with itraconazole and decreased by approximately 13.5-fold when co-administered with rifampin. These findings provide critical insights into the potential drug-drug interactions involving avacopan, which could have significant implications for patient care and treatment planning. (NCT06207682).

Midostaurin drug interaction profile: a comprehensive assessment of CYP3A, CYP2B6, and CYP2C8 drug substrates, and oral contraceptives in healthy participants.

PURPOSE: Midostaurin, approved for treating FLT-3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia and advanced systemic mastocytosis, is metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 to two major metabolites, and may inhibit and/or induce CYP3A, CYP2B6, and CYP2C8. Two studies investigated the impact of midostaurin on CYP substrate drugs and oral contraceptives in healthy participants. METHODS: Using sentinel dosing for participants' safety, the effects of midostaurin at steady state following 25-day (Study 1) or 24-day (Study 2) dosing with 50 mg twice daily were evaluated on CYP substrates, midazolam (CYP3A4), bupropion (CYP2B6), and pioglitazone (CYP2C8) in Study 1; and monophasic oral contraceptives (containing ethinylestradiol [EES] and levonorgestrel [LVG]) in Study 2. RESULTS: In Study 1, midostaurin resulted in a 10% increase in midazolam peak plasma concentrations (Cmax), and 3-4% decrease in total exposures (AUC). Bupropion showed a 55% decrease in Cmax and 48-49% decrease in AUCs. Pioglitazone showed a 10% decrease in Cmax and 6% decrease in AUC. In Study 2, midostaurin resulted in a 26% increase in Cmax and 7-10% increase in AUC of EES; and a 19% increase in Cmax and 29-42% increase in AUC of LVG. Midostaurin 50 mg twice daily for 28 days ensured that steady-state concentrations of midostaurin and the active metabolites were achieved by the time of CYP substrate drugs or oral contraceptive dosing. No safety concerns were reported. CONCLUSION: Midostaurin neither inhibits nor induces CYP3A4 and CYP2C8, and weakly induces CYP2B6. Midostaurin at steady state has no clinically relevant PK interaction on hormonal contraceptives. All treatments were well tolerated.

Preoperative Midazolam and Patient-Centered Outcomes of Older Patients: The I-PROMOTE Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: The effect of oral midazolam premedication on patient satisfaction in older patients undergoing surgery is unclear, despite its widespread use. Objective: To determine the differences in global perioperative satisfaction in patients with preoperative administration of oral midazolam compared with placebo. Design, Setting, and Participants: This double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial was conducted in 9 German hospitals between October 2017 and May 2019 (last follow-up, June 24, 2019). Eligible patients aged 65 to 80 years who were scheduled for elective inpatient surgery for at least 30 minutes under general anesthesia and with planned extubation were enrolled. Data were analyzed from November 2019 to December 2020. Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive oral midazolam, 3.75 mg (n = 309), or placebo (n = 307) 30 to 45 minutes prior to anesthesia induction. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was global patient satisfaction evaluated using the self-reported Evaluation du Vécu de l'Anesthésie Generale (EVAN-G) questionnaire on the first postoperative day. Key secondary outcomes included sensitivity and subgroup analyses of the primary outcome, perioperative patient vital data, adverse events, serious complications, and cognitive and functional recovery up to 30 days postoperatively. Results: Among 616 randomized patients, 607 were included in the primary analysis. Of these, 377 (62.1%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 71.9 (4.4) years. The mean (SD) global index of patient satisfaction did not differ between the midazolam and placebo groups (69.5 [10.7] vs 69.6 [10.8], respectively; mean difference, -0.2; 95% CI, -1.9 to 1.6; P = .85). Sensitivity (per-protocol population, multiple imputation) and subgroup analyses (anxiety, frailty, sex, and previous surgical experience) did not alter the primary results. Secondary outcomes did not differ, except for a higher proportion of patients with hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥160 mm Hg) at anesthesia induction in the placebo group. Conclusion and Relevance: A single low dose of oral midazolam premedication did not alter the global perioperative patient satisfaction of older patients undergoing surgery or that of patients with anxiety. These results may be affected by the low dose of oral midazolam. Further trials-including a wider population with commonplace low-dose intravenous midazolam and plasma level measurements-are needed. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03052660.

Comparison of Caudal Dexmedetomidine and Midazolam as an Adjuvant to Ropivacaine for Postoperative Pain Relief in Children Undergoing Infra-Umbilical Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: We explored the analgesic efficacy of two non-opioid adjuvants (midazolam and dexmedetomidine) with ropivacaine in children undergoing infraumbilical surgeries. METHODS: In this parallel group randomized controlled trial, 135 children aged between 2 and 8 years were recruited. Children were randomly allocated to one of three groups: RD received 1 mL/kg of ropivacaine (0.2%) with dexmedetomidine 1 µg/kg, RM received 1 mL/kg of ropivacaine (0.2%) with midazolam 30 µg/kg, and R received 1 mL/kg of ropivacaine (0.2%) with 1 mL normal saline. The primary outcome of the present study was to determine the duration of postoperative analgesia. Secondary outcomes were assessing postoperative face, leg, activity, cry, consolability (FLACC) pain score, rescue analgesics, hemodynamics, sedation scores, and adverse effects. RESULTS: The analgesia duration was significantly prolonged in the RD and RM group (600.0 [480.0-720.0] minutes and 600.0 [480.0-720.0] minutes, respectively) compared to the R group 360.0 (300.0-480.0) minutes (P < 0.001). The FLACC score was comparatively higher in the R group compared to the RD and RM groups postoperatively. Time for the first rescue analgesia was more prolonged in RD and RM groups when compared with the R group. Postoperative sedation was higher in the RM group up to 120 minutes postoperatively compared to the RD and R groups. CONCLUSION: The combination of dexmedetomidine or midazolam with local anesthetics significantly increases the analgesia duration while minimizing adverse effects.

Prospective, randomised comparison of two intravenous sedation methods for magnetic resonance imaging in children.

BACKGROUND: Children usually need sedation or even anaesthesia for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies. As there is no universally accepted method for this purpose we undertook a prospective, randomised comparison of propofol and dexmedetomidine in children aged 1 to 10 years. METHODS: After Institutional Board approval and parents' informed consent 64 ASA status I or II children scheduled for MRI scan were enrolled. Patients were premedicated with intravenous (IV) midazolam (0.1 mg kg -1 ) and ketamine (1 mg kg -1 ) and randomised to propofol (P) or dexmedetomidine (D) group. A propofol bolus of 1 mg kg -1 followed by infusion of 4 mg kg -1 h -1 , or dexmedetomidine 1 µg kg -1 followed by 2 µg kg -1 h-1 infusion were used. Heart rate, SpO 2 and non-invasive blood pressure were monitored and recorded at 5 min intervals. Results were compared by means of standard statistical methods. RESULTS: Both dexmedetomidine and propofol after premedication with ketamine and midazolam are suitable for MRI sedation, although propofol use results in shorter recovery time. Less interventions are needed when dexmedetomidine is used.

Comparison of intranasal dexmedetomidine-midazolam, dexmedetomidine-ketamine, and midazolam-ketamine for premedication in paediatric patients: a double-blinded randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Paediatric patients are a population with a high level of anxiety. The prevention of perioperative stress in a frightened child is important to render the child calm and cooperative for smoother induction. Intranasal premedication is easy and safe, and the drug is rapidly absorbed into the systemic circulation, ensuring early onset of sedation in children and good effectiveness. METHODS: 150 patients in the age group 2-4 years, ASA class I, undergoing elective surgical procedures were enrolled. The patients were randomly divided into 3 groups: a DM group (receiving intranasal dexmedetomidine 1 µg kg -1 and midazolam 0.12 mg kg -1 ), a DK group (receiving intranasal dexmedetomidine 1 µg kg -1 and keta-mine 2 mg kg -1 ), and an MK group (receiving intranasal midazolam 0.12 mg kg -1 and ketamine 2 mg kg -1 ). After 30 minutes of administration of the drugs, the patients were assessed for parent separation anxiety, sedation, ease of IV cannulation, and mask acceptance. RESULTS: The comparison among the 3 groups showed a statistically significant difference for ease of IV cannulation and mask acceptance at 30 minutes, with a P -value of 0.010 with CI of 0.0-0.02, and P -value 0.007 with CI 0.0-0.02, respectively. The parent separation anxiety and sedation score at 30 minutes was statistically insignificant with a P -value of 0.82 with CI of 0.03-0.14 and P -value 0.631 with CI of 0.38-0.58, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of midazolam and ketamine had a better clinical profile for premedication as compared to other combination drugs used in our study in terms of IV cannulation and acceptance of masks with a comparable decrease in separation anxiety from parents and adequate sedation.

Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Midazolam Gel After Rectal Administration in Healthy Chinese Subjects.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Midazolam rectal gel is a novel rectal formulation that may be a promising and potential alternative to oral administration for pediatric sedation. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and absolute bioavailability of midazolam rectal gel in healthy Chinese subjects. METHODS: An open-label, single-dose, randomized, two-period, two-treatment, crossover clinical study was conducted in 22 healthy subjects (16 males and six females), each receiving 2.5 mg intravenous midazolam in one period and 5 mg midazolam rectal gel in another period (the dosages here were calculated as active midazolam). Safety, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic assessments were conducted throughout the study. RESULTS: All of the subjects completed both treatment periods. The formulation of rectal gel was well tolerated, with no serious adverse events occurring. After a single rectal dose of 5 mg midazolam rectal gel, it was absorbed rapidly with a median value of time to peak concentration (Tmax) of 1.00 h, and mean values of the peak concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-t) of 37.2 ng/mL and 137 h·ng/mL, respectively. The absolute bioavailability of rectal gel was 59.7%. The rectal gel exhibited a relatively delayed onset but a more stable sedative effect and a longer duration when compared with intravenous midazolam. CONCLUSION: Midazolam rectal gel may be a feasible alternative with a high level of acceptance in pediatric sedation and enhanced bioavailability compared to an oral formulation. The modeling results may help to disclose out the exposure-response relationship of midazolam rectal gel and support the design of an escalating-doses study and pediatric extrapolation study. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered at http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn (No. CTR20192350).

Randomised, prospective, blinded, clinical trial of opioid-free injectable anaesthesia with or without multimodal analgesia in kittens undergoing ovariohysterectomy.

OBJECTIVES: This study compared an opioid-free injectable anaesthetic protocol with or without multimodal analgesia in kittens undergoing ovariohysterectomy. METHODS: In this prospective, randomised, blinded, clinical trial, 29 healthy kittens (mean ± SD weight 1.55 ± 0.46 kg; aged 10 weeks to 6 months) were included. Anaesthesia was performed with an intramuscular injection of ketamine (4 mg/kg), dexmedetomidine (40 µg/kg) and midazolam (0.25 mg/kg). In the multimodal group (MMG), cats (n = 14) received meloxicam (0.1 mg/kg SC) and intraperitoneal bupivacaine 0.25% (2 mg/kg), whereas the same volume of saline was administered in the control group (CG; n = 15). Atipamezole (0.4 mg/kg IM) was given 15 mins after ovariohysterectomy. Postoperative pain was assessed using the UNESP-Botucatu multidimensional feline pain assessment scale - short form. Rescue analgesia (buprenorphine 0.02 mg/kg IM in MMG/CG and meloxicam 0.1 mg/kg SC in CG) was administered if pain scores were ⩾4/12. Soft food intake (after 2 and 60 mins) was evaluated at specific time points postoperatively. Statistical analyses were performed with linear models and post-hoc pairwise comparison with Benjamini-Hochberg corrections (P <0.05). RESULTS: The prevalence of rescue analgesia was higher in the CG (n = 15/15) than the MMG (n = 1/14; P <0.001). Pain scores at 1 h, 2 h and 4 h postoperatively were higher in the CG (4.1 ± 2.8, 4.8 ± 3.0 and 5.3 ± 1.2, respectively) than in the MMG (1.6 ± 1.0, 1.1 ± 1.0 and 0.9 ± 0.8, respectively; P <0.001). Food intake (%) at 1 h postoperatively was higher in the MMG after 2 and 60 mins (10.4 ± 9 and 71.9 ± 29, respectively) than in the CG (1.4 ± 2 and 13.9 ± 7, respectively; P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This opioid-free protocol using multimodal analgesia produced adequate postoperative pain relief, while almost eliminating the need for rescue analgesia in kittens undergoing ovariohysterectomy. Pain decreased food intake.

Altered Bioavailability and Pharmacokinetics in Crohn's Disease: Capturing Systems Parameters for PBPK to Assist with Predicting the Fate of Orally Administered Drugs.

BACKGROND AND OBJECTIVE: Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease that affects a wide age range. Hence, CD patients receive a variety of drugs over their life beyond those used for CD itself. The changes to the integrity of the intestine and its drug metabolising enzymes and transporters (DMETs) can alter the oral bioavailability of drugs. However, there are other changes in systems parameters determining the fate of drugs in CD, and understanding these is essential for dose adjustment in patients with CD. METHODS: The current analysis gathered all the available clinical data on the kinetics of drugs in CD (by March 2021), focusing on orally administered small molecule drugs. A meta-analysis of the systems parameters affecting oral drug pharmacokinetics was conducted. The systems information gathered on intestine, liver and blood proteins and other physiological parameters was incorporated into a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) platform to create a virtual population of CD patients, with a view for guiding dose adjustment in the absence of clinical data in CD. RESULTS: There were no uniform trends in the reported changes in reported oral bioavailability. The nature of the drug as well as the formulation affected the direction and magnitude of variation in kinetics in CD patients relative to healthy volunteers. Even for the same drug, the reported changes in exposure varied, possibly due to a lack of distinction between the activity states of CD. The highest alteration was seen with S-verapamil and midazolam, 8.7- and 5.3-fold greater exposure, respectively, in active CD patients relative to healthy volunteers. Only one report was available on liver DMETs in CD, and indicated reduced CYP3A4 activity. In a number of reports, mRNA expression of DMETs in the ileum and colon of CD patients was measured, focussing on P-glycoprotein (p-gp) transporter and CYP3A4 enzyme, and showed contradictory results. No data were available on protein expression in duodenum and jejunum despite their dominant role in oral drug absorption. CONCLUSION: There are currently inadequate dedicated clinical or quantitative proteomic studies in CD to enable predictive PBPK models with high confidence and adequate verification. The PBPK models for CD with the available systems parameters were able to capture the major physiological influencers and the gaps to be filled by future research. Quantification of DMETs in the intestine and the liver in CD is warranted, alongside well-defined clinical drug disposition studies with a number of index drugs as biomarkers of changes in DMETs in these patients, to avoid large-scale dedicated studies for every drug to determine the effects of disease on the drug's metabolism and disposition and the consequential safety and therapeutic concerns.

Evaluation of CYP2C19 activity using microdosed oral omeprazole in humans.

PURPOSE: To investigate the suitability of microdosed oral omeprazole for predicting CYP2C19 activity in vivo in combination with simultaneous assessment of CYP3A and CYP2D6 activity using both microdosed midazolam and yohimbine. METHODS: An open, fixed-sequence study was carried out in 20 healthy participants. Single microdosed (100 µg) and therapeutic (20 mg) doses of omeprazole were evaluated without comedication and after administration of established CYP2C19 perpetrators fluconazole (inhibition) and rifampicin (induction). To prevent degradation of the uncoated omeprazole microdose, sodium bicarbonate buffer was administered. The pharmacokinetics of omeprazole and its 5-hydroxy-metabolite were assessed as well as the pharmacokinetics of midazolam and yohimbine to estimate CYP3A4 and CYP2D6 activity. RESULTS: Calculated pharmacokinetic parameters after administration of 100 µg and 20 mg omeprazole in healthy subjects suggest dose proportionality. Omeprazole clearance was significantly decreased by fluconazole from 388 [95% CI: 266-565] to 47.2 [42.8-52.0] mL/min after 20 mg omeprazole and even further after 100 µg omeprazole (29.4 [24.5-35.1] mL/min). Rifampicin increased CYP2C19-mediated omeprazole metabolism. The omeprazole hydroxylation index was significantly related to omeprazole clearance for both doses. Both fluconazole and rifampicin altered CYP3A4 activity whereas no change of CYP2D6 activity was observed at all. CONCLUSIONS: Microdosed oral omeprazole is suitable to determine CYP2C19 activity, also during enzyme inhibition and induction. However, the administration of sodium bicarbonate buffer also had a small influence on all victim drugs used. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT: 2017-004270-34.

Comparative study between S-(+)-ketamine­midazolam and fentanyl­droperidol in black-tufted marmosets (Callithrix penicillata) / Estudo comparativo entre S-(+)cetamina-midazolam e fentanil-droperidol em saguis-de-tufo-preto (Callithrix penicillata)

Sedative and antinociceptive effects of two anesthetic protocols in black-tufted marmosets were compared in this study. Twenty-six marmosets underwent chemical immobilization for physical examination, blood sampling, tattooing, and microchipping. Animals were randomly treated with S-(+)-ketamine (10 mg/kg) and midazolam (1 mg/kg) (KM) or fentanyl (12.5 µg/kg) and droperidol (625 µg/kg) (FD) given by intramuscular injection. Heart and respiratory rates were recorded. Sedation, antinociception, muscle relaxation, posture, auditory, and visual responses were evaluated using a scoring system. Sedation in KM was achieved faster (p < 0.001) and lasted for a shorter period of time (p = 0.0009). KM was similar to FD in its cardiorespiratory effects, auditory and visual responses. Both protocols promoted adequate sedation to allow manipulation. Animals in KM assumed lateral recumbency while animals in FD maintained a quadrupedal posture during evaluation. FD produced less intense sedation and muscle relaxation but a higher degree of antinociception compared to KM and is suitable for procedures that require analgesia in black-tufted marmosets.(AU)

O presente estudo comparou os efeitos cardiorrespiratórios, sedativos e antinociceptivos de dois protocolos anestésicos em saguis-de-tufo-preto (Callithrix penicillata). Vinte e seis saguis foram submetidos à contenção química para exame físico, coleta de sangue, tatuagem de identificação e microchip. Os animais foram tratados aleatoriamente com a associação de S-(+)-cetamina (10 mg/kg) e midazolam (1 mg/kg) (KM) ou fentanil (12,5 µg/kg) e droperidol (625 µg/kg) (FD), administrados por injeção intramuscular. Foram avaliadas frequência cardíaca, frequência respiratória, sedação, antinocicepção, relaxamento muscular, postura e resposta ao estímulo auditivo e visual. A sedação em KM foi alcançada mais rapidamente (p <0,001) e teve um tempo hábil mais curto (p = 0,0009). KM foi semelhante a FD nos efeitos cardiorrespiratórios, respostas auditivas e visuais. Os dois protocolos promoveram sedação adequada para manipulação. Os animais do grupo KM permaneceram em decúbito lateral durante a avaliação, enquanto os animais em FD mantiveram postura quadrupedal. FD resultou em sedação e relaxamento muscular de menor intensidade, porém com maior escore de antinocicepção em comparação com KM, sendo adequada para procedimentos que requerem analgesia em saguis-de-tufo-preto.(AU)

Intranasal dexmedetomidine and intranasal ketamine association allows shorter induction time for pediatric sedation compared to intranasal dexmedetomidine and oral midazolam.

BACKGROUND: Non-painful diagnostic procedures require an inactive state for a prolonged time, so that sedation is often needed in younger children to perform the procedures. Our standard of care in this setting consists of the association between oral midazolam (0.5 mg/kg) and intranasal dexmedetomidine (4 mcg/kg). One of the limits of this approach is that the onset of action is quite delayed (up to 55 min) and poorly predictable. We chose to compare this association with intranasal-ketamine and intranasal-dexmedetomidine. METHODS: This is a "pre-post" study. The study population included the first forty children receiving sedation with the "new" combination intranasal ketamine (3 mg/kg) and intranasal dexmedetomidine (4 mcg/kg) compared to a historical cohort including the last forty children receiving sedation with our standard of care combination of intranasal dexmedetomidine (4mcg/kg) and oral midazolam (0,5 mg/kg). RESULTS: The association intranasal dexmedetomidine and intranasal ketamine allowed for a significantly shorter sedation induction time than the combination intranasal dexmedetomidine and oral midazolam (13,5 min versus 35 min). Both group's cumulative data showed a correlation between age and sedation effectiveness, with younger children presenting a higher success rate and shorter induction time (p 0,001). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the ketamine and dexmedetomidine intranasal association may have a shorter onset of action when compared to intranasal dexmedetomidine and oral midazolam.

Electrophysiological correlates and predictors of the antidepressant response to repeated ketamine infusions in treatment-resistant depression.

BACKGROUND: Sub-anesthetic ketamine doses rapidly reduce depressive symptoms, although additional investigations of the underlying neural mechanisms and the prediction of response outcomes are needed. Electroencephalographic (EEG)-derived measures have shown promise in predicting antidepressant response to a variety of treatments, and are sensitive to ketamine administration. This study examined their utility in characterizing changes in depressive symptoms following single and repeated ketamine infusions. METHODS: Recordings were obtained from patients with treatment-resistant major depressive disorder (MDD) (N = 24) enrolled in a multi-phase clinical ketamine trial. During the randomized, double-blind, crossover phase (Phase 1), patients received intravenous ketamine (0.5 mg/kg) and midazolam (30 µg/kg), at least 1 week apart. For each medication, three resting, eyes-closed recordings were obtained per session (pre-infusion, immediately post-infusion, 2 h post-infusion), and changes in power (delta, theta1/2/total, alpha1/2/total, beta, gamma), alpha asymmetry, theta cordance, and theta source-localized anterior cingulate cortex activity were quantified. The relationships between ketamine-induced changes with early (Phase 1) and sustained (Phases 2,3: open-label repeated infusions) decreases in depressive symptoms (Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Score, MADRS) and suicidal ideation (MADRS item 10) were examined. RESULTS: Both medications decreased alpha and theta immediately post-infusion, however, only midazolam increased delta (post-infusion), and only ketamine increased gamma (immediately post- and 2 h post-infusion). Regional- and frequency-specific ketamine-induced EEG changes were related to and predictive of decreases in depressive symptoms (theta, gamma) and suicidal ideation (alpha). Early and sustained treatment responders differed at baseline in surface-level and source-localized theta. CONCLUSIONS: Ketamine exerts frequency-specific changes on EEG-derived measures, which are related to depressive symptom decreases in treatment-resistant MDD and provide information regarding early and sustained individual response to ketamine. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: Action of Ketamine in Treatment-Resistant Depression, NCT01945047.

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Letermovir and Midazolam Coadministration in Healthy Subjects.

Letermovir is a human cytomegalovirus (CMV) terminase inhibitor for the prophylaxis of CMV infection and disease in allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplant recipients. In vitro studies have identified letermovir as a potential cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A inhibitor. Thus, the effect of letermovir on the CYP3A isoenzyme-specific probe drug midazolam was investigated in a phase 1 trial. Healthy female subjects received single-dose intravenous (IV; 1 mg) and oral (2 mg) midazolam on days -4 and -2, respectively. Letermovir 240 mg once daily was administered on days 1 to 6, and further single doses of midazolam 1 mg IV and oral midazolam 2 mg were administered on days 4 and 6, respectively. Pharmacokinetics, tolerability, and safety were monitored throughout the trial. Following coadministration with letermovir, the least square means ratio for maximum plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last measurable concentration was 172.4% and 225.3%, respectively, for oral midazolam, and 105.2% and 146.6%, respectively, for midazolam IV. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last measurable concentration ratio of midazolam to 1-hydroxymidazolam increased slightly in the presence of letermovir following IV (8.8-13.1; 49% increase) and oral (3.3-5.3; 59% increase) midazolam. Letermovir reached steady state, on average, by days 5 to 6. All treatments were generally well tolerated. Letermovir demonstrated moderate CYP3A inhibition.

Impact of endoscopist experience, patient age and comorbidities on dose of sedation and sedation-related complications by endoscopic ultrasound.

AIM: The aim of the study is to investigate the influence of endosonographer experience and patient-related factors on the dose of sedation and sedation-related complications during endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). METHODS: Our retrospective analysis included EUS investigations performed between 2015 and 2018 at our institution. Sedation-related complications were defined as cardiorespiratory instability with oxygen saturation drop below 90% or prolonged low blood pressure or bradycardia. RESULTS: In total, 537 EUS examinations were analyzed (37.3% interventional). The median dose of propofol and midazolam were: 140 (30-570) and 3(1-7) mg, respectively. Sedation-related complications were documented in 1.8% of cases. All patients had transient, nonfatal respiratory insufficiency. Totally, 60% of the patients who developed complications were >75 years and 70% were male. The presence of cardiac and/or pulmonary comorbidities was associated with an OR = 8.77 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.8-41.7] and American Society of Anesthesiologists class III with an OR = 7.64 (95% CI, 1.60-36.3) for the occurrence of sedation-related complications. Endosonographer experience did not influence the rate of sedation-related complications. In both diagnostic and interventional EUS, patients with comorbidities and older age received significantly less sedation. Experienced endosonographers used less sedation than trainees. CONCLUSION: Endosonographer experience, patient age and the presence of comorbidities had a significant influence on sedation dose. Sedation-related complications occurred only in 1.8% of cases.

Effects of Ketamine Versus Midazolam on Neurocognition at 24 Hours in Depressed Patients With Suicidal Ideation.

Objective: Subanesthetic ketamine rapidly reduces depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation in some depressed patients. Its effects on neurocognitive functioning in such individuals with significant suicidal ideation is not well understood, even though certain neurocognitive deficits are associated with suicide behavior beyond clinical symptoms.Methods: In this study, depressed patients with clinically significant suicidal ideation (n = 78) underwent neuropsychological testing before and 1 day after double-blind treatment with intravenous ketamine (n = 39) or midazolam (n = 39). A subgroup randomized to midazolam whose ideation did not remit after initial infusion received open ketamine and additional neurocognitive testing a day after this treatment. The primary outcome was change in performance on this neurocognitive battery. The study was conducted between November 2012 and January 2017.Results: Blinded ketamine produced rapid improvement in suicidal ideation and mood in comparison to midazolam, as we had reported previously. Ketamine, relative to midazolam, was also associated with specific improvement in reaction time (Choice RT) and interference processing/cognitive control (computerized Stroop task)-the latter a measure that has been associated with past suicide attempt in depression. In midazolam nonremitters later treated with open ketamine and retested, reaction time and interference processing/cognitive control also improved relative to both of their prior assessments. Neurocognitive improvement, however, was not correlated with changes in depression, suicidal thinking, or general mood.Conclusions: Overall, ketamine was found to have a positive therapeutic effect on neurocognition 1 day after treatment on at least 1 measure associated with suicidal behavior in the context of depression. Results suggest additional independent therapeutic effects for ketamine in the treatment of depressed patients at risk for suicidal behavior.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01700829.

Comparison of the effect of continuous intravenous infusion of sodium valproate and midazolam on management of status epilepticus in children.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Status epilepticus as a pediatric emergency requires rapid seizure control in order to prevent subsequent disabilities. Therefore, the present study was conducted to compare the efficacy and side effects of continuous intravenous infusion of sodium valproate versus midazolam as a third-line treatment of status epilepticus in children. METHODOLOGY: This randomized clinical trial study included all children with convulsive and non-convulsive status epilepticus admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) of the Bu-Ali Sina Hospital in Sari City (Mazandaran Province, Iran) who had not responded to first-line treatment with diazepam and second-line treatment with phenytoin or phenobarbital. They were consequently treated with continuous intravenous infusion of sodium valproate or midazolam to control persistent seizures. RESULTS: The study comprised 70 patients who were randomly assigned to two equal groups of sodium valproate or midazolam treatment. The mean age of patients in group A (sodium valproate) and group B (midazolam) was 3.97 ± 3.33 and 3.84 ± 2.93 years, respectively. In the present study, the most common etiology of status epilepticus was remote symptomatic, accounting for 35% of cases in the two groups. Sodium valproate was effective in controlling status epilepticus in 91.4% of patients, while midazolam was found to be effective in 85.7% of patients (p > 0.05). Patients who received sodium valproate had shorter seizure duration after administration of the drug compared to those who received midazolam (p = 0.01). Eight patients in the midazolam group and two patients in the sodium valproate group were intubated (p = 0.023). The mean duration of stay in the PICU was 3.2 ± 1.4 and 5.6 ± 2.8 days in groups A and B, respectively, showing a significant difference (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: According to our findings, intravenous infusion of sodium valproate can be used as an effective and relatively safe treatment in children with all types of status epilepticus, especially in challenging situations such as lack of intensive care units or respiratory problems.

Reducing Benzodiazepine Exposure by Instituting a Guideline for Dexmedetomidine Usage in the NICU.

BACKGROUND: Midazolam is a benzodiazepine sedative used in NICUs. Because benzodiazepine's effects include respiratory depression and potential detrimental developmental effects, minimizing exposure could benefit neonates. Dexmedetomidine is routinely used for sedation in older pediatric populations. We implemented a quality improvement initiative with the aim of decreasing midazolam infusions by 20% through use of dexmedetomidine. METHODS: A multidisciplinary committee created a sedation guideline that included standardized dexmedetomidine dosing escalation and weaning. Baseline data collection occurred from January 2015 to February 2018, with intervention from March 2018 to December 2019. Percentage of sedation episodes with dexmedetomidine initiated was followed as a process measure. Outcomes measures were percentage of eligible infants receiving midazolam infusions and midazolam-free days per sedation episode. Bradycardia with dexmedetomidine, unplanned extubation rates, and morphine dosage were monitored as balancing measures. RESULTS: Our study included 434 episodes of sedation in 386 patients. Dexmedetomidine initiation increased from 18% to 49%. The intervention was associated with a significant reduction in midazolam initiation by 30%, from 95% to 65%, with special cause variation on statistical process control chart analysis. Midazolam-free days per sedation episode increased from 0.3 to 2.2 days, and patients receiving dexmedetomidine had lower midazolam doses (1.3 mg/kg per day versus 2.2 mg/kg per day, P = 5.97 × 10-04). Bradycardia requiring discontinuation of dexmedetomidine, unplanned extubation rates, and morphine doses were unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a quality improvement initiative was successful in reducing the percentage of patients receiving midazolam infusions and increased midazolam-free days per sedation episode, revealing an overall reduction in benzodiazepine exposure while maintaining adequate sedation.